All Posts

When a confirmed incident occurs under IS.I.OR.220, the objective is not to fix what went wrong. The goal is control — limit the impact on aviation safety, contain the threat, and create conditions for a proper resolution. Repair comes later. This article covers what incident response actually requires, including why your response measure itself may carry immediate safety risk.

Incident and vulnerability detection under EASA Part-IS begins with the collection and analysis of information security events. This article explains how monitoring, internal reporting, external intelligence, and auditing work together to identify abnormal activity, detect incidents early, and uncover vulnerabilities that may impact aviation safety and operational integrity.

Understanding the distinction between vulnerabilities and incidents is critical for effective EASA Part-IS compliance. This article provides a clear, practical breakdown of IS.I.OR.220, helping organisations correctly assess, manage, and respond to each. It offers structured guidance to strengthen your ISMS, support informed decision-making, and ensure a proactive, risk-based approach to aviation information security.

Reducing information security risk under EASA Part-IS goes beyond theory. This article explains how aviation organisations can apply risk treatment in practice, using a real flight operations example. Learn how to reduce risk levels through targeted security controls, structured decision-making, and a practical risk treatment plan aligned with Part-IS requirements.

How should aviation organisations treat information security risks under EASA Part-IS? This article explains how unacceptable cyber risks should be reduced, documented, and managed in practice under IS.I.OR.210. Using a realistic flight operations example, it shows how aviation organisations move from risk identification to effective risk treatment while protecting aviation safety.